The Effect of Regional Similarity-Dissimilarity on Communicator Credibility
- 1 July 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 16 (3) , 211-217
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097301600304
Abstract
Using English Canadian university students as subjects, an experiment was conducted to examine the effects of regional identification in responses to written communications relevant and irrelevant to regional norms. For a communication advocating separatism for Quebec, an English Canadian communicator was judged to be both more trustworthy and more competent than a French Canadian communicator. For the other communication, advocating obligatory financial contributions by alumni to their Alma Mater, no communicator differences were found. Inconsistencies between these findings and previous findings led to the view that the emotional tone of the communications was an important operating variable.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dialect and Identification in Persuasive MessagesLanguage and Speech, 1969
- Defaming and Agreeing with the Communicator as a Function of Emotional Arousal, Communication Extremity, and Evaluative SetSociometry, 1967
- A note on the generality of source‐credibility scalesSpeech Monographs, 1967
- Balancing and extremity effects in reactions of receiver to source and content of communications1Journal of Personality, 1967
- Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965
- Source credibility and response to fear‐arousing communicationsSpeech Monographs, 1965
- The operation of congruity in an oral communication situationSpeech Monographs, 1961
- Opinion congruence with a negative source on one issue as a factor influencing agreement on another issue.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957
- A Study of Certain Factors Involved in Changes of OpinionThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1942