Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Vol. 99 (4) , 178-182
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900414
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2004
- Effects of Editorial Peer ReviewJAMA, 2002
- Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?JAMA, 1998
- Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their ReportsJAMA, 1998
- Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1998
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- Pardonable revisions and protocol reviewsThe Lancet, 1997
- The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics.BMJ, 1983
- Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982