Genomic Imbalances in Neonates With Birth Defects: High Detection Rates by Using Chromosomal Microarray Analysis
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 122 (6) , 1310-1318
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0297
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. Our aim was to determine the frequency of genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects by using targeted array-based comparative genomic hybridization, also known as chromosomal microarray analysis. METHODS. Between March 2006 and September 2007, 638 neonates with various birth defects were referred for chromosomal microarray analysis. Three consecutive chromosomal microarray analysis versions were used: bacterial artificial chromosome–based versions V5 and V6 and bacterial artificial chromosome emulated oligonucleotide–based version V6 Oligo. Each version had targeted but increasingly extensive genomic coverage and interrogated >150 disease loci with enhanced coverage in genomic rearrangement–prone pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions. RESULTS. Overall, 109 (17.1%) patients were identified with clinically significant abnormalities with detection rates of 13.7%, 16.6%, and 19.9% on V5, V6, and V6 Oligo, respectively. The majority of these abnormalities would not be defined by using karyotype analysis. The clinically significant detection rates by use of chromosomal microarray analysis for various clinical indications were 66.7% for “possible chromosomal abnormality” ± “others” (other clinical indications), 33.3% for ambiguous genitalia ± others, 27.1% for dysmorphic features + multiple congenital anomalies ± others, 24.6% for dysmorphic features ± others, 21.8% for congenital heart disease ± others, 17.9% for multiple congenital anomalies ± others, and 9.5% for the patients referred for others that were different from the groups defined. In all, 16 (2.5%) patients had chromosomal aneuploidies, and 81 (12.7%) patients had segmental aneusomies including common microdeletion or microduplication syndromes and other genomic disorders. Chromosomal mosaicism was found in 12 (1.9%) neonates. CONCLUSIONS. Chromosomal microarray analysis is a valuable clinical diagnostic tool that allows precise and rapid identification of genomic imbalances and mosaic abnormalities as the cause of birth defects in neonates. Chromosomal microarray analysis allows for timely molecular diagnoses and detects many more clinically relevant genomic abnormalities than conventional cytogenetic studies, enabling more informed decision-making and management and appropriate assessment of recurrence risk.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacterial artificial chromosome-emulation oligonucleotide arrays for targeted clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analysesGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- Characterization of Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements from the Developmental Genome Anatomy ProjectAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2008
- 22q11.2 Distal Deletion: A Recurrent Genomic Disorder Distinct from DiGeorge Syndrome and Velocardiofacial SyndromePublished by Elsevier ,2008
- Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patientsJournal of Medical Genetics, 2007
- Variation of CNV distribution in five different ethnic populationsCytogenetic and Genome Research, 2007
- Strong Association of De Novo Copy Number Mutations with AutismScience, 2007
- Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal CasesPLOS ONE, 2007
- 3p− syndrome defines a hearing loss locus in 3p25.3Hearing Research, 2007
- Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis of Genomic Imbalance in Children with Mental RetardationAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2006
- Development of diagnostic tools for the analysis of 5p deletions using interphase FISHCytogenetic and Genome Research, 1997