MORE EVIDENCE ON THE MONEY‐OUTPUT RELATIONSHIP
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 35 (1) , 48-58
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01893.x
Abstract
Recent studies have found that money loses its explanatory power over output if the 2980s are included in the sample. Interest rates, not money, appear to predict output. Using annual data for 1915–1993 and quarterly data for 1960–1993, we demonstrate that the supposed breakdown in the money‐output relationship stems from the type of stationary assumption imposed on the data. Assuming difference‐stationary produces results found in the literature. Assuming trend‐stationary produces results indicating that money and output remain statistically related. Moreover, the change in the stationarity assumption greatly affects the quantitative importance cf interest rates in explaining output.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Monetary Aggregate to Target Nominal GDPPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1993
- The power problems of unit root test in time series with autoregressive errorsJournal of Econometrics, 1992
- Co-integration and trend-stationarity in macroeconomic time series: Evidence from the likelihood functionJournal of Econometrics, 1992
- Reconsidering ‘trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series’Journal of Monetary Economics, 1991
- The case for trend-stationarity is stronger than we thoughtJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1991
- The Demand for Money in the United States: Evidence from Cointegration TestsJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1991
- POLICY INFERENCE USING VAR MODELSEconomic Inquiry, 1991
- On the Predictive Power of Interest Rates and Interest Rate SpreadsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1990
- Unit roots in real GNP: Do we know, and do we care?Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1990
- Money does Granger-cause output in the bivariate money-output relationJournal of Monetary Economics, 1988