Interactions of an anti-androgen (cyproterone acetate) with the androgen receptor system and its biological action in the rat ventral prostate

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Male Wistar rats were castrated and implanted with testosterone-filled silastic depots (in vitro release rate: 60 .mu.g/24 h) prior to treatment with 10 mg cyproterone acetate (CyAc) on day 1, and 5 mg on days 4, 7, 10 and 13. Animals were sacrificed on day 14. Control animals were treated identically, with the exception of CyAc administration. Blood was collected and the ventral prostates of 6-8 animals were pooled, homogenized and processed into cytosol and purified nuclei. Steroid determinations CyAc, testosterone, 5.alpha.-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 5.alpha.-androstane-3.alpha.,17.beta.-diol (3.alpha.-diol) were performed by RIA. Specifically bound DHT (charcoal resistant DHT = CR-DHT) represents DHT values (RIA) following treatment of cytosol or nuclear extract with dextran coated charcoal. The androgen receptor was determined in cytosol and nuclear extract by ''exchange assay'' using [3H]methyltrienolone (MT) (18 h, 15.degree. C). The main results were: The steroid levels in plasma (testosterone, DHT, 3.alpha.-diol) were in the range of untreated adult animals and not significantly influenced by the CyAc treatment. Final CyAc levels were 305 .+-. 58 nmol/l (mean .+-. SD, n = 5). Significantly lower DHT, CR-DHT and testosterone levels (P at least < 0.01) were found in cytosol and in nuclei in the CyAc-treated group cytosol (fmol/mg protein): DHT 305 .+-. 61 (n = 5), CR-DHT 54 .+-. 37 (n = 8), testosterone .ltoreq. 8 (n = 5); nuclei (pmol/mg DNA): DHT 0.4 .+-. 0.2 (n = 5), CR-DHT 0.7 .+-. 0.2 (n = 3), testosteone .ltoreq. 0.2 (n = 5)) when compared to controls cytosol: DHT 645 .+-. 232 (n = 15), CR-DHT 204 .+-. 49 (n = 8), testosterone 24 .+-. 12 (n = 10); nuclei: DHT 5.0 .+-. 2.5 (n = 12). CR-DHT 3.1 .+-. 0.7 (n = 5), testosterone 0.9 .+-. 0.6 (n = 7). 3.alpha.-diol was similar in the cytosol of both groups and could not be detected in the nuclei. The androgen receptor concentration was increased in the cytosol of the CyAc-treated group (216 .+-. 17 (n = 4), control group 98 .+-. 10 (n = 5) fmol/mg protein, P < 0.01 and decreased in the nuclear extract (0.61 .+-. 0.25 (n = 4), control 1.75 .+-. 0.25 (n = 5) pmol/mg DNA, P < 0.001). The weight and DNA content of the prostate were reduced following CyAc treatment (weight 191 .+-. 11 mg (n = 9), DNA 622 .+-. 61 .mu.g/organ (n = 8), controls 312 .+-. 9 (n = 8) and 838 .+-. 103 (n = 8), respectively). The data demonstrate that an approximate 40-fold excess of CyAc over testosterone in plasma led to a distinct but partial reduction of nuclear DHT and androgen receptor values coinciding with partial effects on prostate weight and DNA content. These results reflect the ability of the prostate to maintain significant androgen stimulation in the presence of low nuclear DHT and androgen receptor values.