Statistical Tests in Medical Research
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Oncologica
- Vol. 31 (7) , 723-727
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869209083860
Abstract
Various propositions have been made to improve the statistical quality of medical journals: using statistical referees, promoting better collaboration between statisticians and researchers, and teaching of basic statistics to clinicians. The most frequent errors found in medical articles are misinterpretation of p-values or non-significant results and confusion between statistical and clinical significance, inappropriate use of tests requiring precise assumptions, inappropriate or not controlled multiple testing and particularly testing of post hoc hypotheses, and overemphasis on p-values. Many errors arising from the misinterpretation of results of statistical hypothesis tests, the basic principles of this methodology are emphasized, and the usual fallacies found in the medical literature are reviewed.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical aspects of research methodologyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- The task of a statistical refereeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical JournalsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- Comparing the Means of Several GroupsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- EditorialStatistics in Medicine, 1984
- Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.BMJ, 1983
- Statistics in medical journalsStatistics in Medicine, 1982
- Statistics and ethics in medical research. Misuse of statistics is unethical.BMJ, 1980
- Misuse of statistical methods: critical assessment of articles in BMJ from January to March 1976.BMJ, 1977
- Statistics—Servant of All ScienceScience, 1955