The Role of Physician Specialty Board Certification Status in the Quality Movement
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 292 (9) , 1038-1043
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.9.1038
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine's reports and discussions on quality of medical care have focused on a systems-based approach to quality improvement. Our objective is to summarize evidence and theory about the role of a physician's current board certification status in quality improvement. The first body of evidence includes the validity of board certification demonstrated by the testing process, the relationship of examination scores with other measures of physician competence, and the relationship between certification status and clinical outcomes. The second body of evidence involves the adaptation of error prevention theory to medical care. Patient safety is enhanced when problem-solving uses readily accessed habits of behavior, the same behavior necessary to achieve board certification. The third body of evidence, obtained through a Gallup poll, demonstrates that certification and maintenance of certification are highly valued by the public. The majority of respondents thought it important for physicians to be reevaluated on their qualifications every few years and that physicians should do more to demonstrate ongoing competence than is currently required by the profession. We conclude that a physician's current certification status should be among the evidence-based measures used in the quality movement.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Practice-Based Learning and ImprovementTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2004
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Hospital Disclosure Practices: Results Of A National SurveyHealth Affairs, 2003
- The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health SystemJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001
- The Unreliability of Individual Physician "Report Cards" for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic DiseaseJAMA, 1999
- The New Surrogates for Board Certification — What Should the Standards Be?New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Sensitivity of the modified Angoff standard‐setting method to variations in item contentTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1994
- Time-Limited Certification and Recertification: The Program of the American Board of Internal MedicineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- An Analysis of the Knowledge Base of Practicing Internists as Measured by the 1980 Recertification ExaminationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1985