The Scope of Cooperation: Values and Incentives
Preprint
- 1 October 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
What explains the range of situations in which individuals cooperate? This paper studies a model where individuals respond to incentives but are also influenced by norms of good conduct inherited from earlier generations. Parents rationally choose what values to transmit to their offspring, and this choice is influenced by the spatial patterns of external enforcement and of likely future transactions. The equilibrium displays strategic complementarities between values and current behavior, which reinforce the effects of changes in the external environment. Values evolve gradually over time, and if the quality of legal enforcement is chosen under majority rule, there is path dependence: adverse initial conditions may lead to a unique equilibrium where legal enforcement remains weak and individual values discourage cooperation.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of EuropeJournal of the European Economic Association, 2010
- The Design of Pension Pay Out Options When the Health Status during Retirement Is UncertainJournal of Public Economic Theory, 2010
- Creditor passivity: The effects of bank competition and institutions on the strategic use of bankruptcy filingsJournal of Comparative Economics, 2009
- Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: are they a Threat to Innovation Activity?De Economist, 2008
- Economic-social interaction in China1Economics of Transition, 2007
- Living Arrangements in Western Europe: Does Cultural Origin Matter?Journal of the European Economic Association, 2007
- Trust, Social Capital, and Economic DevelopmentJournal of the European Economic Association, 2005
- Cooperation as a Transmitted Cultural TraitRationality and Society, 2004
- Who trusts others?Journal of Public Economics, 2002
- Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: CommentAmerican Economic Review, 1999