Credit Ratings Accuracy and Analyst Incentives
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 101 (3) , 120-124
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.120
Abstract
The financial crisis has brought a new focus on the accuracy of credit rating agencies (CRAs). In this paper, we highlight the incentives of analysts at the CRAs to provide accurate ratings. We construct a model in which analysts initially work at a CRA and can then either remain or move to a bank. The CRA uses incentive contracts to motivate analysts, but does not capture the benefits if the analyst moves. We find that rating agency accuracy increases with CRA monitoring, bank profitability (a positive "revolving door" effect), and can be non-monotonic in the probability of an analyst leaving.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Markets: The Credit Rating AgenciesJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2010
- Ratings shopping and asset complexity: A theory of ratings inflationJournal of Monetary Economics, 2009
- Rating the raters: Are reputation concerns powerful enough to discipline rating agencies?Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009
- The Economics of Structured FinanceJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2009
- Honest certification and the threat of captureInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 2005
- Revolving Doors and the Optimal Tolerance for Agency CollusionThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995