Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’’
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 54 (2) , 1737-1738
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.54.1737
Abstract
In reply to the preceding Comment on an article by D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)], it is emphasized that the most plausible interpretation of the singly conditioned probability function implies that the evolution of the two-state quantum system being considered cannot be characterized as a Markov process on those states over any time interval. And it is pointed out that an alternative interpretation that is offered in the Comment appears to be in conflict with quantum mechanics.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on ‘‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’Physical Review A, 1996
- Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov processPhysical Review A, 1994