Why Factor Analysis Often is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 18 (2) , 97-110
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169401800201
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential CandidatesAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- On the Dimensionality of Public Sentiment toward Partisan and Ideological GroupsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- The Application of an Unfolding Model of the PIRT Type to the Measurement of AttitudeApplied Psychological Measurement, 1988
- An Ordinal I Scaling Method for Questionnaire and Other Ordinal I DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Constraint in European party activists’ sympathy scores for interest groupsEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1987
- A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- A multidimensional conceptualization of party identificationPolitical Behavior, 1980
- Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Empirical and theoretical limitations of the two-factor hypothesis of job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967
- On the bipolarity of semantic space.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1965