Routine use of mupirocin at the peritoneal catheter exit site and mupirocin resistance: still low after 7 years
Open Access
- 5 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 19 (12) , 3140-3143
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh494
Abstract
Objective. The purpose of this study (the third in a series of similar studies) is to evaluate the prevalence of Staphylococcusaureus (SA), methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) and mupirocin-resistant SA (MuRSA) carriers in a peritoneal dialysis centre where patients have been instructed to use prophylactic mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site over the last 7 years. Methods. Swabs were taken from catheter exit site, nares, axillae and groin in 147 chronic peritoneal dialysis out-patients between November 2003 and January 2004. Axillae/groin and nasal samples were pooled and cultured in the same medium, whereas exit site swabs were cultured separately. All SA isolated were tested for methicillin and mupirocin resistance using oxacillin screening plates and E-test strips. Results. Sixteen of 147 patients (10.9%) were found to be SA carriers: of these 13 (8.8%) had a positive nasal/axillae/groin culture; two (1.4%) had both nasal/axillae/groin- and exit site-positive culture; and one (0.7%) had only exit site-positive culture. In these 16 SA carriers, we found mupirocin-resistant strains (MuRSA) in four patients (25%) and MRSA in two patients (12.5%). Among the four MuRSA carriers, one had both nasal/axillae/groin- and exit site-positive culture and three had only nasal/axillae/groin-positive culture. Three high-level resistance and one low-level resistance MuRSA carriers were isolated. One MuRSA strain was also methicillin resistant. All MRSA strains were sensitive to vancomycin and rifampicin. Conclusion. After 7 years' routine use of prophylactic mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site in non-selected chronic peritoneal dialysis patients, MuRSA was found in 25% of SA strains isolated or in 2.7% of the patients. Compared with our previous study, 3 years earlier, there is no significant increase in the MuRSA prevalence in peritoneal dialysis patients who routinely apply mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mupirocin Prophylaxis to Prevent Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Meta-analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Prophylaxis for Infection with Topical Intranasal Mupirocin: An Evidence-Based ReviewClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Mupirocin-Resistant, Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus: Does Mupirocin Remain Effective?Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2003
- Mupirocin resistance after long-term use for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2002
- Topical Mupirocin for Eradication of MRSA Colonization With Mupirocin-Resistant StrainsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- Staphylococcal Peritonitis in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: Colonization With Identical Strains at Exit Site, Nose, and HandsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- Optimizing screening procedures for Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in patients on haemodialysis.Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1998
- The emergence of mupirocin resistance: a challenge to infection control and antibiotic prescribing practiceJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1998
- Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriers in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis With Mupirocin: Long-term ResultsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1993