The incidence of allergy to propolis in 605 consecutive patients patch tested in Prague
- 11 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 18 (4) , 210-212
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02805.x
Abstract
605 consecutive patients were patch tested with the standard CDRG test series and with a 10% alcoholic solution of propolis. Positive allergic reactions to propolis were observed in 25 patients (4.2%); thirteen of them exhibited a simultaneous positive patch test to balsam of Peru. In view of the relatively high incidence of allergic reactions and the appearance of pseudo-cross-sensitivity to another common allergen balsam of Peru, propolis should not be used in topical medicaments or as a component of cosmetic preparations.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contact dermatitis to propolisContact Dermatitis, 1985
- Dermatitis from propolisContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Contact dermatitis from propolisContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Contact dermatitis from propolisContact Dermatitis, 1983
- Occupational dermatitis in a bee‐keeperContact Dermatitis, 1983
- Occupational and cosmetic dermatitis from propolisContact Dermatitis, 1983
- Dermatitis from propolisContact Dermatitis, 1983
- CONTACT DERMATITIS IN BEEKEEPEES DUE TO PROPOLIS (BEE GLUE)*British Journal of Dermatology, 1968
- Berufsekzeme bei BienenzüchternDermatology, 1947