A beginnner's guide to limit cycles, their uses and abuses
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Biological Rhythm Research
- Vol. 26 (2) , 216-232
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09291019509360337
Abstract
Mathematical models of oscillators fall into two major categories, simple (one‐dimensional) and non‐simple (two‐or‐more dimensional). The type of model used to describe a rhythmic system will influence experimental design and interpretation, and very different experimental predictions are made by simple and non‐simple models. The basic properties of non‐simple oscillators that are not shared with simple oscillators are Type 0 resetting, phase singularities, and amplitude changes. Two examples of non‐simple oscillators are adjustable‐amplitude oscillators (such as the frictionless pendulum) and attracting limit cycles. Populations of oscillators may exhibit a wide range of dynamic behaviour, including an adjustable amplitude or a limit cycle, depending on the nature of the individual oscillators and the coupling between them. Simple oscillator models may be appropriate to some biological systems such as developmental cycles and cell cycles, while circadian oscillators are best modelled by populations capable of both amplitude changes and stable entrainment.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chaos : Its significance and detection in biologyBiological Rhythm Research, 1995
- Light-induced suppression of endogenous circadian amplitude in humansNature, 1991
- From Clocks to ChaosPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1988
- Temporal Precision in Circadian Systems: A Reliable Neuronal Clock from Unreliable Components?Science, 1980
- The Geometry of Biological TimePublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Attenuation of the Petal Movement Rhythm in Kalanchoë with Light PulsesPhysiologia Plantarum, 1978
- Resetting biological clocksPhysics Today, 1975
- Resetting the amplitude ofDrosophila's circadian chronometerJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1973