Growth Hormone and Cortisol Responses to Psychological Stress: Comparison of Normal and Neurotic Subjects
- 1 June 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Vol. 42 (6) , 1158-1162
- https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-42-6-1158
Abstract
The mirror drawing test (MDT) was performed to induce acute psychological stress in 9 normal controls and 10 neurotic subjects. Plasma growth hormone (GH) and cortisol were determined serially before, during, and after the test. In controls the MDT caused no significant change in plasma GH level, while in neurotics plasma GH increased progressively following the test. The increase of cortisol also tended to be greater in neurotics as a group, but there was considerable overlap in individual responses. The maximum increments of GH in neurotics correlated inversely with those of cortisol. The results indicate: 1) effective psychological coping mechanisms operate in normal man to keep the hormonal response minimum. 2) GH response is a more adequate indicator than cortisol response to psychological stress in neurotics. 3) GH and cortisol may have different psychological correlates in neurotics. (J Clin Endncrinol Metab42: 1158, 1976)Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of various blood sampling procedures on serum levels of immunoreactive human growth hormoneMetabolism, 1967
- INFLUENCE OF PHYSICAL STRESS AND EXERCISE ON GROWTH HORMONE AND INSULIN SECRETION IN MAN1967
- Growth Hormone Secretion in the Unanesthetized Rhesus Monkey in Response to Noxious Stimuli1Endocrinology, 1967
- Growth Hormone Secretion in Response to Stress in ManNature, 1966
- Effects of Estrogen and Sex Difference on Secretion of Human Growth Hormone1Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1965
- SECRETION OF HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE - PHYSIOLOGIC AND EXPERIMENTAL MODIFICATION1963
- Studies of Blood Pressure in Psychiatric Patients Under StressPsychosomatic Medicine, 1952
- Changes in muscular tension during learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1942