Correspondence Matching in Apparent Motion: Evidence for Three-Dimensional Spatial Representation
- 26 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 233 (4771) , 1427-1429
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3749887
Abstract
The path of an object in apparent motion depends on correspondence matching, the decision that images seen at different places and at different times represent the same object. One determinant of correspondence is proximity. Still debated, however, is whether proximity is defined in a two- or three-dimensional spatial representation. Observers judged the motion path taken by an object with two neighbors of different apparent depth. Given similar two-dimensional distances, objects moved toward the neighbor of the same apparent depth. This is evidence that correspondence operates in a three-dimensional spatial representation.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?Vision Research, 1986
- Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motionsVision Research, 1984
- Stroboscopic Motion in DepthPerception, 1982
- Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.Psychological Review, 1981
- The Effect of Similarity between Line Segments on the Correspondence Strength in Apparent MotionPerception, 1980
- Two Dimensionality of the Correspondence Process in Apparent MotionPerception, 1978
- Perceptual Illusion of Rotation of Three-Dimensional ObjectsScience, 1976
- Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976
- A short-range process in apparent motionVision Research, 1974
- Apparent movement in tridimensional spacePerception & Psychophysics, 1973