Is Corporate Hedging Consistent with Value Maximization? An Empirical Analysis
Preprint
- 25 June 1999
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We study the derivative holdings of firms facing interest rate and/or currency risk. We net long and short positions to measure the extent of hedging with net notional values. We find that hedging increases with expected financial distress costs, firm size, and investment opportunities. Our evidence is also consistent with firms hedging to increase debt capacity and therefore firm value. We explicitly estimate the convexity in each firm's tax function but do not find evidence that convexity affects corporate hedging. We estimate that the potential increase in value related to tax convexity is much smaller than the tax gain associated with increased debt capacity.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discussion: “Who Uses Interest Rate Swaps? a Cross-Sectional Analysis”Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 1998
- Hedging and Coordinated Risk Management: Evidence from Thrift ConversionsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- RETHINKING RISK MANAGEMENTJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1996
- Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining IndustryThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Corporate Risk ManagementThe Journal of Derivatives, 1995
- On the Determinants of Corporate HedgingThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Interest Rate Swaps and Corporate Financing ChoicesThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- The Determinants of Capital Structure ChoiceThe Journal of Finance, 1988
- The Determinants of Firms' Hedging PoliciesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1985
- Optimal Hedging PoliciesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1984