Nutritional Assessment
- 22 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 306 (16) , 969-972
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198204223061606
Abstract
THE diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition is often based on objective measurements of nutritional status,1 including assessments of hepatic secretory proteins (serum albumin and serum transferrin), anthropometric evaluation, creatinine-height index, and determination of cell-mediated immunity. Although these indicators are epidemiologically useful and correlate with morbidity and mortality,2 3 4 5 6 no single measurement is of consistent value in individual patients.nutritional status may also be assessed by clinical examination. Although this method is used routinely, its validity and reproducibility do not appear to have been tested.To determine the reproducibility and validity of clinical assessment of nutritional status, we studied the nutritional status of . . .Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1980
- In vivo measurements of body protein based on the determination of nitrogen by prompt γ analysisThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1979
- Correlation Between Anergy and a Circulating Immunosuppressive Factor Following Major Surgical TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1979
- RAPID-TURNOVER TRANSPORT PROTEINS: AN INDEX OF SUBCLINICAL PROTEIN-ENERGY MALNUTRITIONThe Lancet, 1979
- Implications of Malnutrition in the Surgical PatientArchives of Surgery, 1979
- Delayed HypersensitivityAnnals of Surgery, 1977
- Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patientJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1977
- Host Resistance in Sepsis and TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1975
- An Anthropometric Estimation of Body Density and Lean Body Weight in Young WomenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1970
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968