Assessment of the reliability of physical measures
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 11 (6) , 383-389
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770110606
Abstract
Assessment of the reliability of physical measures that yield continuous data (e.g., physiological measures such as blood pressure and anthropometric measures such as weight) should include the following statistics and procedures: mean, minimal and maximal differences; standard deviation of the net differences; technical error of measurement; and clinically meaningful indices of agreement. Displaying differences graphically and using Exploratory Data Analysis are excellent methods of summarizing differences. In those situations where any measurement error is important, regardless of its direction, the absolute value of the differences should be used to describe average differences. Correlation coefficients are not recommended because they are not adequate tests of reliability.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fluctuating dental asymmetry and measurement errorAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1984
- Multiple observers, humidity, and choice of precision statistics: Factors influencing craniometric data qualityAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1983
- BACK TO BASICS: PERCENTAGE AGREEMENT MEASURES ARE ADEQUATE, BUT THERE ARE EASIER WAYSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979
- OBSERVER AGREEMENT, CREDIBILITY, AND JUDGMENT: SOME CONSIDERATIONS IN PRESENTING OBSERVER AGREEMENT DATAJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- REVIEWER'S COMMENT: JUST BECAUSE IT'S RELIABLE DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU CAN USE ITJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CHOICE OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY ESTIMATESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITYJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1976
- Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975
- Judgment of counseling process: Reliability, agreement, and error.Psychological Bulletin, 1972
- Precision measurement and calibration :Published by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ,1969