An Examination of the Lost‐letter Technique1
- 1 June 1973
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 165-173
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb02703.x
Abstract
The results of three investigations of the validity and economics of the lost‐letter technique are reported. Although the return rate of the lost‐letter technique was higher than in the case of more obtrusive survey techniques involving hand‐distributed postcard questionnaires and mail surveys, the more obtrusive survey techniques were more economical to carry out, were more accurate in their predictions of election outcomes, and gave results more highly consistent among themselves than with the results obtained by the lost‐letter technique. Furthermore, the results indicated that the act of returning a lost letter may not be strongly affected by the identity of the sender or addressee indicated on the letter.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Return Rates of “Lost” Letters as a Function of Whether the Letter is Stamped and Amount of Money Apparently in the LetterPsychological Reports, 1971
- Effects of sentiment and completion of a helping act on observer helping: A case for socially mediated Zeigarnik effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
- Comment on "A Failure to Validate the Lost Letter Technique"Public Opinion Quarterly, 1969
- A Failure to Validate the Lost-Letter TechniquePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1969
- Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- The Lost-Letter Technique: A Tool of Social ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1965