Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 2 (2) , 119-143
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
Abstract
(1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal: Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 119-143.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component AnalysisMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1992
- An Empirical Comparison of Factor, Image, Component, and Scale ScoresMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1992
- The Robustness of 2SLS Estimation of a Non-normally Distributed Confirmatory Factor Analysis ModelMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1990
- Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Improper Solutions in the Analysis of Covariance Structures: Their Interpretability and a Comparison of Alternate RespecificationsPsychometrika, 1987
- The Effects of Sampling Error and Model Characteristics on Parameter Estimation for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor AnalysisMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1985
- Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimationPsychometrika, 1985
- The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysisPsychometrika, 1984
- Sample Size Effects on Chi Square and Other Statistics Used in Evaluating Causal ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 1982
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1980