Opium to Heroin: Restrictive Opium Legislation and the Rise of Heroin Consumption in Hong Kong
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Policy History
- Vol. 4 (3) , 307-324
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898030600006394
Abstract
Given our current preoccupation with conducting a war on drugs, we run the danger of forgetting that, once upon a time, the sale of opium was widely condoned and, in some Asian societies under colonial rule, even monopolized by the state. While this clearly encouraged the widespread use of opium in these societies, some have claimed that it at least served to keep more dangerous and addictive drugs at bay. Within Asia there is no question that the postwar era has seen a dramatic shift away from opium to other addictive drugs, in particular heroin, and that this has coincided with the introduction of anti-opium laws. Are we then justified in concluding that the success of the anti-opium movement in prohibiting opium has served to encourage the spread of heroin?Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hong Kong government opium monopoly, 1914–1941The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 1983
- The Pro-Heroin Effects of Anti-Opium Laws in AsiaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1976
- Opium in ChinaBritish Journal of Addiction to Alcohol & Other Drugs, 1970
- British Trade and the Opening of China, 1800-42The American Historical Review, 1953