Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Augmentative and Alternative Communication
- Vol. 7 (3) , 161-170
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619112331275873
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Comparative Translucency of Initial Lexical Items Represented in Five Graphic Symbol Systems and SetsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1990
- Iconicity may not be everything, but it seems to be something: A comment on DePaul and Yoder (1986)Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1988
- A Response to Lloyd and Fuller: Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: a proposed superordinate classificationAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- Iconicity in manual sign systems for the augmentative communication user: Is that all there is?Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1986
- A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PHOTO‐OBJECT MATCHING SKILLS OF SEVERELY RETARDED ADOLESCENTSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1981
- Learning Words Using Traditional Orthography and the Symbols of Rebus, Bliss, and CarrierJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1981
- Why Are Signed Languages Easier to Learn than Spoken Languages? Part TwoBulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1978
- Impacts of Learning American Indian Sign Language on Mentally Retarded Children: A Preliminary ReportPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1977
- Recognition of Verbal Labels of Pictured Objects and Events by 17- to 30-Month-Old InfantsJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976
- Nonspeech Noun Usage Training with Severely and Profoundly Retarded ChildrenJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974