Scintimammographic Analysis of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Previously Identified by Conventional Mammography
Open Access
- 3 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 90 (11) , 846-850
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.11.846
Abstract
Background: In randomized trials, screening mammography has led to decreased mortality from breast cancer. However, the low positive predictive value of mammography (i.e., the proportion of patients with a positive test result who actually have breast cancer) results in a large number of unnecessary biopsies. We determined whether scintimammography with technetium99m-sestamibi is a useful supplemental diagnostic tool for women with nonpalpable breast abnormalities identified by conventional mammography. Methods: Scintimammography was performed preoperatively on 70 women who were 31–66 years of age (mean age and median age = 51 years). These women had nonpalpable breast abnormalities identified by conventional mammography; subsequently, a needle-localization excisional biopsy of each suspicious lesion was performed. Scintimammographic images were interpreted independently by two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to all clinical and pathologic data, and an interobserver variation analysis was performed. Results: Interobserver variation analysis of the scintimammographic findings showed an agreement for breast diagnosis of 97% and a kappa coefficient of 0.90. Comparison of scintimammographic findings and histopathologic results revealed that the sensitivity (proportion of patients with breast cancer who had a positive test result), the specificity (proportion of patients without breast cancer who had a negative test result), the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value (proportion of patients with a negative test result who actually did not have breast cancer) of scintimammography were 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23%-85%), 87% (95% CI = 75%- 94%), 38% (95% CI = 15%-68%), and 93% (95% CI = 82%-98%), respectively. Four of nine breast cancers were not detected by scintimammography. Conclusion: Because of excellent interobserver agreement, scintimammography provides an objective way of detecting primary breast carcinoma. In view of its low sensitivity and positive predictive value, however, scintimammography is not currently recommended as a screening test in patients with nonpalpable positive mammographic findings. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:846–9]Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 1997CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1997
- Recent Trends in U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality RatesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: Evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortalityInternational Journal of Cancer, 1996
- Cancer statistics, 1996CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1996
- Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: comparison with mammography and magnetic resonance imagingEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1996
- New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Nonpalpable Invasive Breast CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial — 5-year results and stage at discoveryBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1989
- Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial.BMJ, 1988
- Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five-Year Summary ReportCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1982