Origin and evolution of the genus Homo
- 27 February 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 355 (6363) , 783-790
- https://doi.org/10.1038/355783a0
Abstract
It is remarkable that the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known representatives of our own genus, Homo, remain obscure. Advances in techniques for absolute dating and reassessments of the fossils themselves have rendered untenable a simple unilineal model of human evolution, in which Homo habilis succeeded the australopithecines and then evolved via H. erectus into H. sapiens — but no clear alternative consensus has yet emerged.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Was “Lucy” more human than her “child”? Observations on early hominid postcranial skeletonsJournal of Human Evolution, 1991
- Stratigraphic context of fossil hominids from the Omo group deposits: Northern Turkana Basin, Kenya and EthiopiaAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1989
- Early hominid phylogenyJournal of Human Evolution, 1987
- Some aspects of femoral morphology in Homo erectusJournal of Human Evolution, 1983
- Origin of bipedalismAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1980
- The Amateur ScientistScientific American, 1978
- Hominid phylogenetics and the existence of Homo in Member I of the Swartkrans formation, South AfricaJournal of Human Evolution, 1978
- Evidence for an Advanced Plio-Pleistocene Hominid from East Rudolf, KenyaNature, 1973
- The Bearing of East Rudolf Fossils on Early Hominid SystematicsNature, 1972
- Cranial Capacity of the Hominine from Olduvai Bed INature, 1965