Mode effects in surveys of gay men: A within‐individual comparison of responses by mail and by telephone
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 67-75
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551969
Abstract
In an evaluation of a community‐level AIDS prevention program, a random sample of gay bar patrons was sent questionnaires by mail, and a random household sample was interviewed by phone. Over 3 baseline years, 581 members of the bar cohort switched response modes for various reasons, including reassignment by the investigators. Regardless of mode sequence, these same men were roughly twice as likely to report unprotected anal intercourse with a nonprimary partner by mail as by phone, but only half as likely to report volunteering in AIDS efforts. The mode effects found here for gay men are comparable to those previously found among Blacks, in keeping with previous reports of elevated social desirability scores in both groups.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Motivation to Report Sensitive Behaviors on Surveys: Evidence From a Bogus Pipeline Experiment1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997
- Socially desirable responding and self‐reported HIV infection risk behaviors among intravenous drug usersAddiction, 1993
- Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing for Household Drug Use SurveysInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1991
- A Reexamination of the Bogus PipelineEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Underreporting of Substance Use in a National Longitudinal Youth Cohort: Individual and Interviewer EffectsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1988
- The Validity of Methadone Clients' Self-Reported Drug UseInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1987
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Question Threat and Response BiasPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1978
- An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response DistortionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976
- A forced-choice, acquiescence-free, social desirability (defensiveness) scale.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964