How well do patients report noncompliance with antihypertensive medications?: a comparison of self-report versus filled prescriptions
- 28 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 13 (1) , 11-19
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.819
Abstract
To address poor patient compliance with antihypertensives, clinicians and researchers need accurate measures of adherence with prescribed regimens. Although self-reports are often the only means available in routine practice, their accuracy and agreement with other data sources remain questionable. A telephone survey was conducted on 200 hypertensive patients treated with a single antihypertensive agent in a large health maintenance organization (HMO) or a Veterans Affairs medical center (VAMC) to obtain self-reports of the frequency of missing antihypertensive therapy. We then analyzed records of all filled prescriptions to calculate the number of days that patients actually had antihypertensive medications available for use. Agreement between the two data sources was measured with correlation coefficients and kappa statistics. Logistic regression models were used to identify demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of overstating compliance. There was very poor agreement between self-reported compliance and days actually covered by filled prescriptions (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.01, 0.28). Very poor agreement was also observed between a categorical measure of self-reported compliance (ever vs. never missing a dose) and categories of actual compliance defined by filled prescriptions (< 80% vs > 80% of days covered; kappa = 0.12, 95%CI: -0.02, 0.26). Surprisingly, few factors were associated with inaccurate self-reporting in either crude or adjusted analyses; fewer visits to health care providers was significantly associated with overstating compliance. Compliance was markedly overstated in this sample of patients and few characteristics identified those who reported more versus less accurately. Clinicians and researchers who rely on self-reports should be aware of these limits and should take steps to enhance their accuracy.Keywords
Funding Information
- Outcomes Research Department, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute
- National Institutes of Health (K01-MH0165-01)
- Health Services Research Training Award, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the Harvard School of Public Health (T32-HS00020-15)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Compliance with antihypertensive therapy among elderly Medicaid enrollees: the roles of age, gender, and race.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Prevalence of Hypertension in the US Adult PopulationHypertension, 1995
- Refractory HypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Improving compliance and increasing control of hypertension: Needs of special hypertensive populationsAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Improved compliance measures: Applications in an ambulatory hypertensive drug trialClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1990
- The natural history of medication compliance in a drug trial: Limitations of pill countsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1989
- Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication AdherenceMedical Care, 1986
- Screening for Noncompliance Among Patients With HypertensionMedical Care, 1981
- Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance?Hypertension, 1980
- RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL OF STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN PRIMARY HYPERTENSIONThe Lancet, 1975