JOINT ECONOMIC DESIGN OF MEAN AND VARIANCE CONTROL CHARTS
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Engineering Optimization
- Vol. 14 (1) , 65-78
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03052158808941200
Abstract
This paper develops an economically designed x¯ − s2 control chart and compares it to the economically designed x¯ − R control chart in terms of loss cost, power and Type I error. Specific case examples are given. The results show that the x¯ − s2 control chart has lower minimal cost and higher power than the x¯ − R control chart. The paper also presents a very good index to show, firstly, the joint effect of power and loss cost and, secondly, the joint effect of Type I error and loss cost. The numerical study also shows the x¯ − s2 control procedure is better than the x¯ − R control procedure in terms of both, power and cost, and type 1 error and cost, in most cases.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal production plan in a tool wear process with rewards for acceptable, undersized and oversized partsEngineering Costs and Production Economics, 1987
- The Economic Design of Control Charts: A Unified ApproachTechnometrics, 1986
- Optimal decision rules for determining the length of the production runComputers & Industrial Engineering, 1985
- Economic Selection of Quality of Manufactured ProductTechnometrics, 1984
- Economic Design of a Joint X- and R -Control ChartA I I E Transactions, 1981
- Joint Economic Design ofXand R Control Charts with Alternate Process ModelsA I I E Transactions, 1979
- Joint Economically Optimal Design of X̄ and R Control ChartsManagement Science, 1977
- `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical ProblemsJournal of the ACM, 1961
- The Economic Design of | barX Charts used to Maintain Current Control of a ProcessJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1956
- THE PROBABILITY INTEGRAL OF THE RANGE IN SAMPLES OF n OBSERVATIONS FROM A NORMAL POPULATIONBiometrika, 1942