Amplitudes and Intrapatient Variability of Myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials to Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Ketamine/N2O- and Propofol/N2O-Based Anesthesia
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 213-217
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00008506-200207000-00007
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether there are differences in amplitudes and intrapatient variability of motor evoked potentials to five pulses of transcranial electrical stimulation between ketamine/N2O- and propofol/N2O-based anesthesia. Patients in the propofol group (n = 13) and the ketamine group (n = 13) were anesthetized with 50% N2O in oxygen, fentanyl, and 4 mg/kg/hr of propofol or 1 mg/kg/hr of ketamine, respectively. The level of neuromuscular blockade was maintained at an M-response amplitude of approximately 50% of control. Motor evoked potentials in response to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation were recorded from the right adductor pollicis brevis muscle, and peak-to-peak amplitude and onset latency of motor evoked potentials were evaluated. To estimate intrapatient variability, the coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean × 100%) of 24 consecutive responses was determined. Motor evoked potential amplitudes in the ketamine group were significantly larger than in the propofol group (mean, 10th–90th percentile: 380 μV, 129–953 μV; 135 μV, 38–658 μV, respectively;P < .05). There were no significant differences in motor evoked potential latency (mean ± standard deviation: 20.9 ± 2.2 msec and 21.4 ± 2.2 msec, respectively) and coefficient of variation of amplitudes (median [range]: 32% [22–42%] and 26% [18–41%], respectively) and latencies (mean ± standard deviation: 2.1 ± 0.7% and 2.1 ± 0.7%, respectively) between the ketamine and propofol groups. In conclusion, intrapatient variability of motor evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial stimulation is similar between ketamine/N2O- and propofol/N2O-based anesthesia, although motor evoked potential amplitudes are lower during propofol/N2O-based anesthesia than ketamine/N2O-based anesthesia.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Within patient variability of lower extremity muscle responses to transcranial electrical stimulation with pulse trains in aortic surgeryClinical Neurophysiology, 1999
- Effect of nitrous oxide on myogenic motor potentials evoked by a six pulse train of transcranial electrical stimuli: a possible monitor for aortic surgeryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1999
- Within-Patient Variability of Myogenic Motor-Evoked Potentials to Multipulse Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Two Levels of Partial Neuromuscular Blockade in Aortic SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1999
- Differential effects of nitrous oxide and propofol on myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses during sufentanil anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997
- Variability of Motor-Evoked Potentials Recorded During Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia from the Tibialis Anterior Muscle After Transcranial Electrical StimulationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1996
- Effect of Desflurane Anesthesia on Transcortical Motor Evoked PotentialsJournal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 1996
- The Effects of Propofol on Rat Transcranial Magnetic Motor Evoked PotentialsNeurosurgery, 1995
- Low Concentrations of Isoflurane Abolish Motor Evoked Responses to Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Nitrous Oxide/Opioid Anesthesia in HumansAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1991
- Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgeryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1991
- Influence of Anesthetics—Nitrous Oxide in Particular—on Electromyographic Response Evoked by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation of the CortexNeurosurgery, 1989