How well do we know the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix?
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 40 (5) , 1562-1568
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.40.1562
Abstract
We evaluate the Kobayashi-Maskawa (KM) matrix using a maximum-likelihood method which takes into account experimental errors on input data and "systematic errors" associated with theoretical approximations. We carefully reconsider the constraints from meson decays and mixings as well as violation. We derive values for all matrix elements with errors smaller than 0.008, show that the ratio must be bigger than 0.036, and that the phase angle of the KM representation is smaller than . Surprisingly our conclusions depend very weakly on the value of the top-quark mass. Any experiment violating the constraints of our fitted KM matrix would imply physics beyond the standard model with three generations and a minimal Higgs sector.
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- B0 − B0 mixing, CP violation and the B-meson decayPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Observation of charmless B meson decaysPhysics Letters B, 1988
- Bounds on a top quark with charged Higgs decayPhysics Letters B, 1988
- A light top quark after all?Physics Letters B, 1987
- Experimental analysis of weak mixing angles between three or four quark generationsThe European Physical Journal C, 1987
- Accurate Verification of the Conserved-Vector-Current and Standard-Model PredictionsPhysical Review Letters, 1986
- Radiative corrections toβdecay and the possibility of a fourth generationPhysical Review Letters, 1986
- Exclusive semileptonic decays of heavy mesonsThe European Physical Journal C, 1985
- Determination of the elementsV us andV ud of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrixThe European Physical Journal C, 1984
- Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa MatrixPhysical Review Letters, 1983