Facial nerve regeneration through semipermeable chambers in the rabbit
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 102 (7) , 784-796
- https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199207000-00008
Abstract
Peripheral neural regeneration, over a 10‐mm transectional gap, was determined in 70 rabbit buccal divisions of the facial nerve using two entubational systems (semipermeable and impermeable silicone chambers) prefilled with three natural occurring media (serum, blood, and saline) during a 5‐week period. The number of myelinated axonal regenerates at the midchamber and at 2 mm in the distal transected neural stump were counted in each group and compared to pooled myelinated axonal counts in 9 normal rabbit buccal divisions of the facial nerve. Semipermeable porous chambers had an overall greater regeneration success rate (75% vs. 42.8%) and regained, on the average, a higher number of myelinated axons (51.4% vs. 26.1%) than silicone chamber regenerates. Semipermeable chambers prefilled with serum or blood had significantly higher regeneration success rates, myelinated axonal counts, and percentages of neural innervation of the distal transected neural stump. Both entubational systems produced similar axonal counts with intraluminal saline. The highest overall success rate (93.7%) and average number of myelinated axons per chamber (3072) were achieved in semipermeable chambers prefilled with serum. The greatest variability in myelinated axonal counts (0 to 3266 axons) and percentage of distal stump innervation (5.5% to 98.1%) was seen in silicone chambers filled with saline. The percentage of myelinated axons from the midchamber that innervated the distal stump was greater in semipermeable chambers with blood (73%) and serum (54%) than in silicone saline chambers (43%). On the average, the distal stumps from semipermeable chambers filled with serum (47%) and blood (33.5%) regained a higher percentage of normal myelinated axonal counts than silicone‐saline chambers (12.5%). These results suggest that both the construction of entubational chamber and the intraluminal medium can have significant influence on neurite regeneration. Semipermeable chambers prefilled with serum have a strong neurite‐promoting potential in peripheral neural regeneration of rabbit facial nerves.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facial nerve regeneration in the silicone chamber: The influence of nerve growth factorExperimental Neurology, 1989
- Blind-ended semipermeable guidance channels support peripheral nerve regeneration in the absence of a distal nerve stumpBrain Research, 1988
- Ultrastructural and morphometric analysis of long-term peripheral nerve regeneration through silicone tubesJournal of Neurocytology, 1988
- Extent of fiber regeneration after peripheral nerve repair: Silicone splint vs. suture, gap repair vs. graftExperimental Neurology, 1987
- Permeable tubes increase the length of the gap that regenerating axons can spanBrain Research, 1987
- Peripheral nerve regeneration with entubulation repair: Comparison of biodegradeable nerve guides versus polyethylene tubes and the effects of a laminin-containing gelExperimental Neurology, 1987
- Increased rate of peripheral nerve regeneration using bioresorbable nerve guides and a laminin-containing gelExperimental Neurology, 1985
- Neurite-promoting factors and extracellular matrix components accumulating in vivo within nerve regeneration chambersBrain Research, 1984
- An effective sleeving technique in nerve repairJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1984
- Nerve regeneration in silicone chambers: Influence of gap length and of distal stump componentsExperimental Neurology, 1982