Women and "Hopeless" Congressional Candidacies
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Politics Quarterly
- Vol. 9 (4) , 449-466
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x8100900404
Abstract
This article examines the extent to which women were nominated by the major parties to run for the House of Representatives in contests they had little chance of winning. The findings indicate that between 1916 and 1978, a larger proportion of women than men was nominated for "hopeless" contests, but the difference, while significant at times, is not as great as might be expected. Republican women fared better than Democratic women during the first 50 years, but that pattern was recently reversed. Nevertheless, Democrats were not much better off in the 1970s than they were in the 1930s, and Republicans were decidedly worse off. A steady increase in the number of women nominated for House seats suggests that the number of women Representatives will grow, in spite of continued gender-related differences in the nominating process.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing Patterns of Female Recruitment to the U. S. House of RepresentativesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1979
- Women and Representation: the Case of HawaiiThe Journal of Politics, 1978
- The Recruitment of Women for Public OfficeAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1977
- Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat?Polity, 1976
- Race, Class and Support for Female CandidatesThe Western Political Quarterly, 1975
- Political Implications of Gender Roles: A Review of the LiteratureAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing MarginalsPolity, 1974
- Political Education and Sexual LiberationPolitics & Society, 1972
- On the Status of WomenAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1971
- Women in Congress: 1917-1964The Western Political Quarterly, 1966