Los mejores hospitales. Entre la necesidad de información comparativa y la confusión
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Revista de Calidad Asistencial
- Vol. 16 (2) , 119-130
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1134-282x(01)77393-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complication Screening Programme: validity and sources of dataInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000
- Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitalsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- ¿Paradojas de la Información Sobre Morbilidad Hospitalaria?Gaceta Sanitaria, 1999
- ¿Previenen las enfermedades crónicas la mortalidad intrahospitalaria? Paradojas y sesgos en la información sobre morbilidad hospitalariaGaceta Sanitaria, 1998
- Identifying Complications of Care Using Administrative DataMedical Care, 1994
- A Method for Screening the Quality of Hospital Care Using Administrative Data: Preliminary Validation ResultsQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1992
- Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Using Administrative Diagnostic Data to Assess the Quality of Hospital Care: Pitfalls and Potential of ICD-9-CMInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990
- Assessing Hospital-Associated Deaths From Discharge DataPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Can Medicare Prospective Payment Survive the ICD-9-CM Disease Classification System?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986