Informed Consent by Well-Nigh Abject Adults
- 17 April 1980
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 302 (16) , 917-918
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198004173021611
Abstract
Society has become increasingly restless with the paternalistic attitudes of professional experts. The courts, reflecting the values of society, have increasingly reinforced the principle of self-determination as enunciated by Cardozo: "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body."1 Physicians are consultants to patients, but patients, not physicians, must finally decide for themselves where their best interests lie. The ordinary patient, whose "dependence upon the physician for information affecting his well-being, in terms of contemplated treatment, is wellnigh abject,"2 cannot possibly make a reasoned decision without being . . .Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Patients Recall of the Preoperative Discussion After Retinal Detachment SurgeryAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1979
- Written informed consent in patients with breast cancerCancer, 1979
- Informed Consent in Medical PracticeArchives of Neurology, 1978
- Research Involving Human SubjectsScience, 1978
- Consent, Informed Consent and the Consent FormNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Community medicinePostgraduate Medicine, 1976
- Informed Consent: Recall by Patients Tested PostoperativelyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1976
- OBSERVATIONS ON THE MYTH OF “INFORMED CONSENT”Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1976
- The Fiction of Informed ConsentJAMA, 1976
- Informed consent. A study of patient reactionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1971