Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland
Top Cited Papers
- 20 January 2004
- Vol. 18 (1) , 27-49
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00377.x
Abstract
A major moral problem in relation to the deCODE genetics database project in Iceland is that the heavy emphasis placed on technical security of healthcare information has precluded discussion about the issue of consent for participation in the database. On the other hand, critics who have emphasised the issue of consent have most often demanded that informed consent for participation in research be obtained. While I think that individual consent is of major significance, I argue that this demand for informed consent is neither suitable nor desirable in this case. I distinguish between three aspects of the database and show that different types of consent are appropriate for each. In particular, I describe the idea of a written authorisation based on general information about the database as an alternative to informed consent and presumed consent in database research.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- For Whom the Cell TollsCurrent Anthropology, 2002
- Informed Consent and Genetic InformationStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2001
- Genetic research on the UK population – do new principles need to be developed?Trends in Molecular Medicine, 2001
- The Icelandic genome debateTrends in Biotechnology, 2001
- Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collectionsBMJ, 2000
- The Icelandic Healthcare Database and Informed ConsentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The Icelandic database---do modern times need modern sagas?BMJ, 1999
- ‘Strengthened’ Icelandic bioethics committee comes under fireNature, 1999
- Torres Strait IslandersAnthropology Today, 1999
- The Threat to Medical-Records ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997