Dvs.GST: Response to Heller and Siegismund (2009) and Ryman and Leimar (2009)
Top Cited Papers
- 5 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 18 (10) , 2088-2091
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04186.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- GST is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation — a comment on Jost's DMolecular Ecology, 2009
- Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation GST, DEST and G’ST: how wrong have we been?Molecular Ecology, 2009
- Mismeasuring biological diversity: Response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008)Ecological Economics, 2009
- Interpreting and estimating measures of community phylogenetic structuringJournal of Ecology, 2008
- Statistical significance tests are unnecessary even when properly done and properly interpreted: Reply to commentariesInternational Journal of Forecasting, 2007
- Entropy and diversityOikos, 2006
- A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASUREEvolution, 2005
- Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an AlternativeThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2000
- The Insignificance of Statistical Significance TestingThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1999
- Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ, 1986