Reading text from computer screens
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Computing Surveys
- Vol. 19 (4) , 329-357
- https://doi.org/10.1145/45075.46162
Abstract
This paper reviews empirical studies concerning the readability of text from computer screens. The review focuses on the form and physical attributes of complex, realistic displays of text material. Most studies comparing paper and computer screen readability show that screens are less readable than paper. There are many factors that could affect the readability of computer screens. The factors explored in this review are the features of characters, the formatting of the screen, the contrast and color of the characters and background, and dynamic aspects of the screen. Numerous areas for future research are pinpointed.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive approaches to understanding reading: Implications for instructional practice.American Psychologist, 1986
- Computer supported reading vs reading text on paper: a comparison of two reading situationsInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1985
- RESEARCH NOTE Fixed versus Variable Letter Width for Televised TextHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1983
- Video display terminals and vision of workers Summary and overview of a symposium†Behaviour & Information Technology, 1982
- Search Time with a Color Display: Analysis of Distribution FuncationsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1982
- Reading speed and text production A note on right-justification techniquesErgonomics, 1981
- Is there an optimum speed for presenting text on a VDU?International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1981
- Color Code Size for Searching Displays of Different DensityHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1976
- On the control of eye saccades in readingVision Research, 1974
- Readability of technical training materials presented on microfiche versus offset copy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971