Prospective Anthropometric Analysis of Sagittal Orbital-Globe Relationship following Fronto-orbital Advancement in Childhood
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 103 (5) , 1341-1346
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199904050-00001
Abstract
Fronto-orbital advancement is a common procedure for correction of supraorbital retrusion in patients with coronal craniosynostosis. The aim of this study was two-fold: to quantitate change in the sagittal orbital-globe relationship following fronto-orbital advancement in childhood and to determine the ratio of skeletal-to-soft tissue movement. Soft-tissue points on the orbital rim, orbitale superius (os), orbitale laterale (ol), orbitale inferius (oi), and nasion (n), referenced to apex corneae (ac), were measured preoperatively and postoperatively by a custom-made anthropometer. Intraoperative bony advancement was measured with a caliper. Patients were selected with uniform advancement at the fronto-nasal suture and laterally at the mortise and tenon. Fifteen patients with syndromic craniosynostosis were included in the study (six male, nine female): Apert (n = 2), Crouzon (n = 5), Pfeiffer (n = 4), Saethre-Chotzen (n = 3), and Boston type (n = 1). Average age at operation was 8.7 years (range, 4.5 to 10.5 years). Age, sex, method of fixation, postoperative interval, diagnosis, and skeletal movement were analyzed for possible effect on the magnitude of soft-tissue advancement. Average intraoperative skeletal advancement was 12.1 mm, and average postoperative soft-tissue movement was 10.3 mm (p < 0.001), measured at the midpoint of the supraorbital rims (os). The soft tissue: skeletal movement ratio was 0.9:1. Os was the only point at which soft-tissue advancement could be predicted (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.67); soft-tissue changes at ol, oi, and n were unpredictable. Skeletal movement was the only determinant of soft-tissue advancement of all variables tested, i.e., diagnosis, age, sex, previous fronto-orbital advancement, and wire versus plate fixation. We make recommendations for calculating the magnitude of fronto-orbital advancement, based on preoperative anthropometry and a soft-to-hard tissue advancement factor.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Synostotic Frontal Plagiocephaly: Anthropometric Comparison of Three Techniques for Surgical CorrectionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Posterior skull surgery in craniosynostosisChild's Nervous System, 1996
- Stability of Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Nonsyndromic Bilateral Coronal Synostosis: A Quantitative Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1996
- The Concept of the Sagittal Orbital-Globe Relationship in Craniofacial SurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1996
- A combined frontoorbital and occipital advancement technique for use in total calvarial reconstructionJournal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- RhinoplastyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1993
- The frontoorbital advancement — on the use of 3D-CT and the miniplate osteosynthesisNeurosurgical Review, 1992
- Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplastyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1992
- Facial Form Analysis of the Lower and Middle FacePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1986
- Aberdeen Growth Study: I. The Prediction of Adult Body Measurements from Measurements Taken Each Year from Birth to 5 YearsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1956