Surgical Staging for Patients Presenting With Grade 1 Endometrial Carcinoma
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 105 (3) , 487-493
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000149151.74863.c4
Abstract
To examine the impact of surgical staging of patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer. The charts of all patients who presented for surgery for endometrial cancer between March 1997 and July 2003 were analyzed for demographic data, final tumor histology, grade, stage, and complications. A total of 349 patients underwent surgical management for endometrial cancer. Preoperatively, 181 (52%) were identified with grade 1 disease, with a mean age of 61 years (range 27-89). Surgical staging (pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy) was performed in 82% of cases and was omitted only in cases when disease was apparently confined to the endometrium and surgical risk was high. In staged patients, 3.2% had severe surgical complications. There were 2 perioperative mortalities (1 pulmonary emboli and 1 myocardial infarct). In comparison of pre- and postoperative histology, 19% of patients were upgraded, with 15% grade 2, 0.5% grade 3, 2.5% serous or clear cell, and 1% mixed mesodermal tumor. Lymph node metastases were found in 3.9% of patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer, and 10.5% had extrauterine spread (> IIb). High-risk uterine features, including myometrial invasion more than 1/2, grade 3 lesions, high-risk histologic variants, and/or cervical involvement, were found in 26% of the patients. No patients with stage Ia-IIb endometrioid cancer received adjuvant teletherapy or chemotherapy. Four patients with low-risk uterine features were found to have extrauterine disease. Twelve percent of patients received adjuvant therapy, and 17% avoided teletherapy and/or chemotherapy based on surgical staging. Surgical staging in patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer significantly impacted postoperative treatment decisions in 29% of patients. Omitting lymphadenectomy in patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial cancer may lead to inappropriate postoperative management.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endometrial cancer: is surgical staging necessary?Current Opinion in Oncology, 2001
- The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasiaCancer, 2000
- Endometrial adenocarcinoma ‐ presenting pathology is a poor guide to surgical managementAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen-Section Diagnosis in Stage I Endometrial AdenocarcinomaGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2000
- Endometrial cancer: accuracy of the finding of a well differentiated tumor at dilatation and curettage compared to the findings at subsequent hysterectomyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1999
- Surgical Staging Endometrial CancerClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium: Survival Comparisons of Patients with and without Pelvic Node SamplingGynecologic Oncology, 1995
- Intraoperative evaluation of prognostic factors in stage I endometrial cancer by frozen section: how reliable?Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1993
- Endometrial adenocarcinoma in Norway. A study of a total populationCancer, 1991
- Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group studyCancer, 1987