The relationship between preoperative endometrial thickness, the anteroposterior diameter of the uterus and clinical outcome following transcervical resection of the endometrium

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify whether the endometrial thickness, or the anteroposterior diameter of the uterus as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS), could be used to predict the clinical outcome following transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE). An open observational trial was carried out, involving 195 consecutive patients undergoing TCRE, 188 of whom completed follow-up. The patients were examined by TVS preoperatively, and then 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year following TCRE. In all examinations, endometrial thickness, the anteroposterior diameter and residual endometrium, uterine morphology and the clinical outcome as measured by pain reduction, bleeding index and amenorrhea were assessed. Patients with a preoperative endometrial thickness of 8 mm or less had a higher rate of amenorrhea after 1 year than patients with an endometrial thickness exceeding 8 mm. Outcome did not relate to the histological phase of the endometrium obtained during resection. Neither the uterine anteroposterior diameter, or the presence of submucous fibroids, had any influence on the clinical outcome. Cavity fluid was observed in some cases but was not always associated with symptoms. Residual endometrium could be detected by TVS in 38% of the women after 1 year, but the vast majority of these patients reported a satisfactory outcome from the procedure. We conclude that the size of the anteroposterior diameter does not affect the clinical outcome of TCRE, whilst the preoperative endometrial thickness does have a significant impact on the likelihood of achieving amenorrhea after 1 year. The data suggest that TCRE should preferably be performed when the endometrium is at its thinnest and that there may be a useful role for agents that produce endometrial atrophy prior to surgery.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: