Comparing Social Policies: Some Problems of Method and the Case of Social Security Benefits in Australia, Britain and the USA
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 17 (3) , 267-288
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400016810
Abstract
The cross-national works of development sociologists and of political scientists have sought to disentangle some of the determinants of welfare, whereas studies in comparative social policy have been mainly evaluative. These have laid themselves open to charges of being, variously, a-theoretical, unsystematic and narrowly focused on the state sector. However, a case is made here for the continuation of such studies with a clear focus on social policy rather than the mixed economy of welfare, using more explicit evaluative criteria and a range of methods. A small comparative study of social security benefit levels in Australia, Britain and the USA is used as an illustration of the potential in this approach and the problems of method involved.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Income Transfer Policies and the Poor: A Cross-National PerspectiveJournal of Social Policy, 1985
- The Changing Nature of PovertyThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1985
- Australia's income-security system: Its origins, nature and prospectsInternational Social Security Review, 1983
- Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare StatePublished by University of California Press ,1981
- Public Assistance in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany: Does Social Democracy Make a Difference?Comparative Politics, 1978