Biometrical and chromosome analyses of lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for central excitation
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Heredity
- Vol. 56 (1) , 19-24
- https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.4
Abstract
Lines of Drosophila melanogaster, bidirectionally selected for extreme and opposite expression of central excitatory state (CES), were subjected first to biometrical and then to chromosome analysis. The analyses revealed that (a) low CES expression is partially dominant to high, (b) at least two chromosomes (II and III) are correlated with CES expression, (c) for the low line, both chromosomes, II and III, are necessary for low expression, (d) cytoplasmic factors are involved with CES expression, and (e) loci of minor effect on the X and Y chromosomes are correlated with CES expression.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Further evidence for a relationship between central excitatory state and classical conditioning in the blow flyPhormia reginaBehavior Genetics, 1983
- A chromosome substitution analysis of geotactic maze behavior inDrosophila melanogasterBehavior Genetics, 1978
- Behavior-genetic analysis of Phormia regina: conditioning, reliable individual differences, and selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1977
- Biometrical GeneticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1971
- Classical conditioning in the blowfly (Phormia regina): Associative and excitatory factors.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971
- Studies in experimental behavior genetics: V. Negative geotaxis and further chromosome analyses in Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969
- Sensory input and central excitation and inhibition in the blowfly.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965
- Studies in experimental behavior genetics: IV. Chromosome analysis for geotaxis.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962
- Studies in experimental behavior genetics: II. Individual differences in geotaxis as a function of chromosome variations in synthesized Drosophila populations.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959
- The manifold effect of selectionHeredity, 1949