Audit of postoperative pain control Influence of a dedicated acute pain nurse
Open Access
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 51 (12) , 1093-1096
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb15039.x
Abstract
Summary: The inadequacies of conventional intramuscular opioid analgesia have fuelled an expansion in the use of patient‐controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia after surgery. This is not always accompanied by increased education and specialist supervision of ward staff and patients. A survey in our hospital prior to the appointment of an Acute Pain Nurse showed an unacceptable incidence of side effects when epidural analgesia was employed on ordinary surgical wards. More surprisingly, efficacy of patient‐controlled analgesia was found to be low. Frequent review of patients and regular education of ward staff by a specialist Pain Nurse have achieved a substantial reduction in side effects of epidural analgesia and improvement in efficacy of patient‐controlled analgesia. We have shown that the advantages of patient‐controlled analgesia can be largely negated by failure to address deficiencies in knowledge of pain management amongst ward staff and patients.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- National provision of acute pain servicesAnaesthesia, 1996
- A survey of acute pain services in the United KingdomBMJ, 1995
- Extradural infusion analgesia for postoperative pain reliefBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1994
- Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.BMJ, 1992
- THE FIRST YEAR'S EXPERIENCE OF AN ACUTE PAIN SERVICEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991
- Reduction of post-operative morbidity following patient-controlled morphineCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1990