The Need to Treat Mild Hypertension
- 12 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 256 (22) , 3134-3137
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380220100031
Abstract
Despite the clear-cut result of the Australian Therapeutic Trial in Mild Hypertension, which demonstrated prospectively the benefit of treatment of diastolic blood pressure in the range of 95 to 109 mm Hg, a retrospective analysis that classified subjects by the average diastolic pressure level attained during the trial purported to show an absence of treatment benefit at lower average diastolic pressures and a negative treatment effect at higher levels. However, the method of classification by average attained diastolic pressure introduced substantial selection bias, invalidating the retrospective analysis and rendering as spurious both the deleterious treatment effect and its lack of efficacy at lower diastolic levels. (JAMA1986;256:3134-3137)Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple Risk Factor Intervention TrialRisk Factor Changes and Mortality ResultsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.BMJ, 1985
- The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension.Hypertension, 1984
- THE IMPACT OF SELECTED INDICES OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT ON ALL-CAUSE MORTALITYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1983
- Mild hypertension. When and how to treatArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1983
- Should Mild Hypertension Be Treated?New England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Whom to treat: The dilemma of mild hypertensionAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Mild hypertension: New light on an old clinical controversyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1980