E. C. Tolman and the Intervening Variable: A Study in the Epistemological History of Psychology
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 50 (2) , 268-282
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289109
Abstract
E. C. Tolman's ‘purposive behaviorism’ is commonly interpreted as an attempt to operationalize a cognitivist theory of learning by the use of the ‘Intervening Variable’ (IV). Tolman would thus be a counterinstance to an otherwise reliable correlation of cognitivism with realism, andS-Rbehaviorism with operationalism. A study of Tolman's epistemological background, with a careful reading of his methodological writings, shows the common interpretation to be false. Tolman was a cognitivist and a realist. His ‘IV’ has been systematically misinterpreted by both behaviorists and antibehaviorists. For this reason, Tolman's alliance with modern cognitivism and his influence on its development have been underestimated.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Existential HypothesesPhilosophy of Science, 1950
- DISCUSSIONJournal of Personality, 1949
- On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.Psychological Review, 1948
- The postulates and methods of "behaviorism."Psychological Review, 1948
- Psychology versus Immediate ExperiencePhilosophy of Science, 1935
- A behavioristic theory of ideas.Psychological Review, 1926
- A Behavioristic View of PurposeThe Journal of Philosophy, 1921
- Instinct and purpose.Psychological Review, 1920
- Docility and purposiveness.Psychological Review, 1918
- More concerning the temporal relations of meaning and imagery.Psychological Review, 1917