Assessment of Demand for Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Using Willingness to Pay
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 103 (3) , 539-545
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000116212.89556.42
Abstract
To investigate the demand for invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling) in a racially/ethnically diverse group of pregnant women of all ages in the San Francisco Bay Area by using estimates of willingness to pay for these procedures. We surveyed 447 women of varying ages, ethnicity, and socioeconomic levels to assess their desire to undergo and willingness to pay for invasive prenatal testing for chromosomal disorders. Each woman was asked what she would be willing to pay for invasive diagnostic testing up to the full cost of the procedure. We also asked several demographic and attitudinal questions. Overall, 49% of the women indicated an interest in undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing. Women aged 35 years and older were more likely to desire testing as compared with women aged less than 35 years (72% versus 36%, P <.001). Of the women aged less than 35 years who desired testing, 31% indicated that they would be willing to pay the full price of $1,300, whereas 73% were willing to pay a portion of the cost. Maternal age of 35 years or greater (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0, 5.6) and willingness to have an elective abortion (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.6, 4.9) were significant predictors of desire to undergo prenatal diagnostic testing after controlling for income, race/ethnicity, and education. Maternal age of 35 years or greater (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.59, 7.88) and having an income greater than $35,000 (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.02, 5.26) were significant predictors of willingness to pay the full price of testing. A substantial proportion of women of all ages indicate a desire to undergo and a willingness to pay for prenatal diagnostic testing. Variations in willingness to pay are correlated with both socioeconomic and attitudinal differences in addition to age. Guidelines regarding use of prenatal genetic diagnosis should be expanded to offer testing to all women, not just those deemed at increased risk. II-2Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-Trimester Screening for Trisomies 21 and 18New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Procedure-related miscarriages and down syndrome–affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferencesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Who should be offered prenatal diagnosis? The 35-year-old question.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEWPrenatal Diagnosis, 1996
- Reducing the Need for Amniocentesis in Women 35 Years of Age or Older with Serum Markers for ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The Safety and Efficacy of Chorionic Villus Sampling for Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenetic AbnormalitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- Preventing the birth of infants with Down's syndrome: a cost-benefit analysis.BMJ, 1976
- A Survey of Mongoloid Births in Victoria, Australia, 1942-1957American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1962
- The relative aetiological importance of birth order and maternal age in mongolismProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character, 1934