Statistics of Racial Segregation: Measures, Evidence and Policy
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Studies
- Vol. 41 (3) , 661-681
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000178735
Abstract
Subsequent to riots in UK northern cities, claims of self-segregation and polarised communities are examined with data unique to the city of Bradford and first results from the UK population census. Statistics relating to race often reinforce misleading stereotypes that are unhelpful to the development of appropriate social policy. Previous studies of indices of segregation are shown to be inadequate through lack of consideration of change over time and the confounding of population change with migration. The separation of natural change and migration supports survey evidence that dispersal of South Asian populations has taken place at the same time as absolute and relative growth. Social policy will do well to take on board these demographic facts in a positive inclusive approach to all residents in all areas.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is Segregation?Sociology, 2002
- The ethnic geography of EthniCitiesEthnicities, 2002
- Numerical measures of segregation: desirable properties and their implicationsMathematical Social Sciences, 2001
- The Scale of Dissimilarity: Concepts, Measurement and an Application to Socio‐Economic Variation Across England and WalesTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2000
- The challenges of measuring the ethno-cultural diversity of Britain in the new millenniumPolicy & Politics, 2000
- Defining ethnic groups: Origin or identify?1Patterns of Prejudice, 1998
- Sectarian demography, territoriality and political development in Northern IrelandPolitical Geography, 1998
- Does Britain Have Ghettos?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1996
- The Biology of RacePublished by University of California Press ,1981
- Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1869