The Dutch obstetric intervention study — variations in practice patterns
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 50 (2) , 145-150
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(95)02424-b
Abstract
Objective: To compare obstetric intervention rates between Dutch hospitals. Methods: A total of 28 934 hospital births under secondary care (specialist care for medium‐/high‐risk pregnancies) in 1990 were analyzed in a stratified, random sample of Dutch hospitals based on the records of the Dutch Netherlands perinatal database. Comparisons were made of the intervention rates between hospitals. Results: The intervention rates of the various hospitals differed widely. The most striking difference was in the cesarean section (CS) rate for non‐vertex first twins, with a range of 0–100% and a mean rate of 47.6%. On average a CS for a term breech was performed in 30.8% of cases and sedation or analgesics were administered in 16.2% of cases. The mean rate of episiotomy for a term breech was 71.5%, the lowest rate being 18.8%. Conclusion: Our results show relatively low intervention rates with considerable interhospital variation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countriesPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1993
- Epidemic of caesarean sections in BrazilThe Lancet, 1991
- Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian consensus conference statement on cesarean birthSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- A Successful Program to Lower Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Holding back the tide of caesareans.BMJ, 1988
- Management of pregnancy and childbirth in England and Wales and in FrancePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1988
- Comparisons of National Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Operations in the United States, 1979 to 1984Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in EuropeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- Variations in Medical Care among Small AreasScientific American, 1982