Recommendation to Develop Strategies to Increase the Number of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Timely Access to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- 2 May 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 113 (17) , 2152-2163
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.174477
Abstract
Although evidence suggests that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in the majority of patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), only a minority of patients with STEMI are treated with primary PCI, and of those, only a minority receive the treatment within the recommended 90 minutes after entry into the medical system. Market research conducted by the American Heart Association revealed that those involved in the care of patients with STEMI recognize the multiple barriers that prevent the prompt delivery of primary PCI and agree that it is necessary to develop systems or centers of care that will allow STEMI patients to benefit from primary PCI. The American Heart Association will convene a group of stakeholders (representing the interests of patients, physicians, emergency medical systems, community hospitals, tertiary hospitals, and payers) and quality-of-care and outcomes experts to identify the gaps between the existing and ideal delivery of care for STEMI patients, as well as the requisite policy implications. Working within a framework of guiding principles, the group will recommend strategies to increase the number of STEMI patients with timely access to primary PCI.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Improvement in Time to Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1999 to 2002Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Design of a standardized system for transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary interventionAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- An international perspective on acute coronary syndrome care: Insights from the global registry of acute coronary eventsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Implications of the Mechanical (PCI) vs Thrombolytic Controversy for ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on the Organization of Emergency Medical ServicesCritical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2004
- Pharmacoinvasive TherapyCirculation, 2004
- Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction — Is It Worth the Wait?New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Regionalization of Care for Acute Ischemic Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)The Lancet, 2002
- Trends in acute myocardial infarction management: use of the national registry of myocardial infarction in quality improvementPublished by Elsevier ,2000