Home Monitoring of Uterine Activity
- 30 April 1992
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 326 (18) , 1222-1224
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199204303261813
Abstract
In the article by Sachs et al. about home monitoring of uterine activity (Nov. 7 issue),1 the authors make numerous errors in their "analysis" of our study.2 The role of home uterine-activity monitoring is to provide objective data about uterine contractions to facilitate the early diagnosis of labor. This results in the provision of more effective tocolytic therapy and the subsequent prolongation of pregnancy.3 The authors state that to be effective, this form of technology should prevent preterm birth. This end point is unreasonable. It is analogous to suggesting that a thermometer should cure infection rather than measure temperature — i.e., provide an objective finding that the physician can use to begin early treatment after the diagnosis is confirmed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does It Prevent Prematurity?New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Multicenter randomized clinical trial of horne uterine activity monitoring for detection of preterrn laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Prevention of preterm birth in high-risk patients: The role of education and provider contact versus home uterine monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- ANGIOGRAPHIC ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-DIRECTED DRAINAGE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEMORRHAGE AND INFECTION WITH ABDOMINAL PREGNANCYObstetrics & Gynecology, 1990
- Cost effectiveness of ambulatory uterine activity monitoringInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1989
- Prevention of preterm birth by ambulatory assessment of uterine activity: A randomized studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Magnesium sulfate as a tocolytic agentAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983